ONE MIGHT ASK; WHY DO ALL THESE RECONSTRUCTIONS LOOK SO DIFFERENT?? THE ANSWER LIES WITHIN THE LIBERAL EVOLOGICAL INTERPRETATIONS OF DOGMATIC EVOLUCYISM. IN OTHER WORDS, THE ACADEMIC ELITE CAN'T GET THEIR ACT TOGETHER. THE DIFFERENCES OCCUR AS FOLLOWS. ONE (UNIVERSITY ORDAINED) HIGH PRIEST TELLS HIS SCRIBE THAT LUCY & LUCKY WERE MORE APE THAN MAN, ANOTHER TELLS HIS SCRIBE THEY WERE MORE MAN THAN APE, WHILE ANOTHER SAYS THEY WERE HALF APE & HALF MAN! THE ONLY "FACT" THAT IS INDISPUTABLE ABOUT THIS SILLORY IS THERE IS NOT ENOUGH INDISPUTABLE EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE TO VERIFY IT! ALL OF THESE RECONSTRUCTIONS ARE BASED MAINLY ON THE FRAGMENTARY AND INCOMPLETE FOSSIL REMAINS OF LUCY AND LUCKYS SKULLS (ABOVE & BELOW).
| FOR A SCIENTIST TO "USE PARTS OF SEVERAL INDIVIDUALS" TO RECONSTRUCT A SKULL AND THEN HAVE THE SCIENTIFIC COMMUNITY CANONIZE IT TO THE WORLD AS "PROOF OF HUMAN EVOLUTION" IS NOTHING LESS THAN INTELLECTUAL DISHONESTY AND ACADEMIC FRAUD! Return to Contents |